ركن الخطأ في المسؤولية التقصيرية للمؤرخ دراسة تحليلية مقارنة The element of error in tort liability of the historian - a comparative analytical study

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

كلية القانون جامعة قطر - كلية الحقوق جامعة القاهرة

المستخلص

المؤرخ هو ضمير الأمة، وهو من يسجل ماضي الشعوب، ويرسم رؤى المستقبل، ومن ثمّ فقد بات الحديث عن ركن الخطأ في المسؤولية التقصيرية للمؤرخ الناشئة عن  توثيق الحقيقة التاريخية أمرًا مهمًا يعكس مدى مصداقية ما كتبه المؤرخون، فالمؤرخ ملتزم بأن يكون صادقًا وأمنيًا، وأن يقول الحقيقة من من دون تزييف أو تحريف، وبالنظر إلى عدم وجود تعريف قانوني للمؤرخ في غالبية الدول، فقد تبنينا في هذه الدراسة مفهومًا واسعًا للمؤرخ بأنه: كل من يمارس مهنة الكتابة ذات الطابع التاريخي.
وقد تجسدت إشكالية هذا البحث في التساؤل عن صور الخطأ في مجال المسؤولية التقصيرية للمؤرخ وحالات الإعفاء منها.
وللإجابة عن هذا السؤال قسمنا البحث إلى مبحثين: تناولنا في أولهما صور خطأ المؤرخ، وخصصنا ثانيهما للحديث عن حالات انتفاء خطأ المؤرخ .
وقد خلصنا في نهاية هذا البحث إلى العديد من النتائج من أهمها: أن المؤرخ لديه الحرية الكاملة في تحليل الحقائق التاريخية وفقًا لبعض القيود التشريعية والقضائية؛ وبناء على ذلك يجب على المحاكم مراعاة خصوصية عمل المؤرخ، وفائدته الاجتماعية.
 
Abstract:
The historian is the conscience of the nation, which records the past of peoples, and draws visions of the future, and then it has become talking about the corner of error in the tort responsibility of the historian arising from documenting the historical truth is important that reflects the credibility of what historians wrote, the historian is committed to be honest and security, and to tell the truth without falsification or distortion, and given the lack of a legal definition of the historian in most countries, we have adopted in this study a broad concept of the historian that:  Anyone who practices the profession of writing of a historical nature.
The problem of this research was embodied in the question of the forms of error in the field of tort liability of the historian and the cases of exemption from it.
To answer this question, we divided the research into two sections: we dealt with the first pictures of the historian's error, and we devoted the second to talk about the absence of the historian's error. At the end of this research, we have concluded many conclusions, the most important of which are: that the historian has complete freedom to analyze historical facts in accordance with some legislative and judicial restrictions; and accordingly, the courts must take into account the specificity of the historian's work, and his social benefit.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية

المراجع

  1. أولًا: مراجع باللغة العربية

    1. إبراهيم عبدالعزيز إبراهيم داود، المسؤولية المدنية عن خطأ الامتناع. دراسة مقارنة، مجلة روح القوانين بكلية الحقوق جامعة طنطا، عام2011.
    2. أحمد شعبان محمد طه، المسؤولية المدنية عن الخطأ المهني لكل من الطبيب والصيدلى والمحامى والمهندس المعمارى، دار الجامعة الجديدة، 2010.
    3. أيمن سعد سليم، الامتناع مصدرًا للمسؤولية المدنية، دار النهضة العربية القاهرة 2003.
    4. حسن حسين البراوي، مخاطر التطور بين قيام المئولية والإعفاء منها، دار النهضة العربية، عام2008.
    5. حسن حلاق، التاريخ ومسؤولية المؤرخ في تصحيح وإعادة كتابة التاريخ المؤامرات والتدخلات الدولية في لبنان 1840 – 1860 نموذجا، فبراير 2020.
    6. رياض أحمد عبد الغفور، " المركز القانوني للمؤرّخ دراسة في التزامات وحقوق ومَسؤوليّة المؤرّخ المدنية "، مجلة الباحث للعلوم القانونية، المجلد الثاني، العدد الثاني، 2021.
    7. الصغير محمد مهدي، خطأ الإمتناع في المسؤولية المدنية: دراسة تحليلية و مقارنة، مجلة كلية الحقوق للبحوث القانونية والاقتصادية، ع1، جامعة الإسكندرية - كلية الحقوق 2014.
    8. طارق سرور، جرائم النشر والإعلام، الطبعة الأولى، دار النهضة العربية- القاهرة 2004.
    9. عبدالرحيم الحسناوي، النقد التاريخي في منطق المؤرخ: الرؤى النظرية والمنهجية، منتدى الكلمة للدراسات والأبحاث، س29، العدد 116،2022.
    10. محمد جريو، المسؤولية المدنية الناشئة عن أضرار التلوث الكهرومغناطيسى، دار الجامعة الجديدة، 2010.
    11. منصورية قدور، النقد التاريخي وأهميته في إبراز الحقيقة التاريخية، مجلة الرواق للدراسات الاجتماعية والإنسانية، المجلد ٧، العدد ۱، ۲٠۲۱.

    ثانيًا: مراجع باللغة الإنجليزية

    1. Bo Zhao, LEGAL CASES ON POSTHUMOUS REPUTATION AND POSTHUMOUS PRIVACY: HISTORY CENSORSHIP, LAW, POLITICS AND CULTURE, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Fall, 2014.
    2. David H. Flaherty, Privacy and Confidentiality: The Responsibilities of Historians, Reviews in American History, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Sep., 1980).
    3. David J.E. Chmiel, Five Trends in Geopolitical Risk for Investors to Watch in 2018 and Beyond , Law stated as of 05 Feb 2018
    4. Delman (B.), “L’office du juge et l’histoire”, Droit et société 38-1998,
    5. Jackson, Dick,Cultural Property Protection in Stability Operations, Army Lawyer, Vol. 2008, Issue 10 (October 2008).
    6. Jonathan Gorman, History and Theory, Dec., 2004, Vol. 43, No. 4, Theme Issue 43: Historians and Ethics (Dec., 2004).
    7. Kevin Chamberlain, War and Cultural Heritage: An Analysis of the 1954 Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and Its Two Protocols 7 (2004)
    8. Luigi Cajani, “Criminal Laws on History: The Case of the European Union,” Historein 11 (2011):
    9. Nelson, William E, History and Neutrality in Constitutional Adjudication , Virginia Law Review, Vol. 72, Issue 7 (October 1986)
    10. Pierre Nora, “History, Memory and the Law in France, 1990-2010,” Historein11 (2011)
    11. Raffi Wartanian, Memory Laws in France and their Implications: Institutionalizing Social Harmony,HUMANITY IN ACTION, November, 2009.
    12. Richard J. Evans, History, Memory, and the Law: The Historianas Expert Witness, 41 Hist. & Theory 326 ,2002.
    13. Rob Kahn ,FREE SPEECH, OFFICIAL HISTORY AND NATIONALIST POLITICS: TOWARD A TYPOLOGY OF OBJECTIONS TO MEMORY LAWS, Florida Journal of International Law ,Fall, 2019
    14. Robert A. Kahn, Holocaust Denial and the Law: A Comparative Study 17-22 (2004).
    15. Weaver, Russell L.; Depierre, Nicolas; Boissier, Laurence ,HOLOCAUST DENIAL AND GOVERNMENTALLY DECLARED “TRUTH”: FRENCH AND AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, Tex. Tech L. Rev. 495(2008-2009).

    ثالثًا: مراجع باللغة الفرنسية:

    1. Antoine PROST, « Histoire, vérité, méthodes. Des structures argumentatives de l’histoire », Le Débat, 92, 1996.
    2. Bertrand MATHIEU, « La liberté de la recherche, droit fondamental constitutionnel et international», in Marie-Angèle HERMITTE (dir.), La liberté de la recherche et ses limites, Paris, Romillat, 2001, p. 59.
    3. BIGOT, Les exigences de l’information et la protection de la vie privée , LP, Nov. 1995,
    4. Carole Vivant, L’Historien saisi par le Droit, Dalloz, Paris, 2007.
    5. Carole VIVANT, L'historien saisi par le droit. Contribution à l'étude des droits de l'histoire – Catherine Puigelier – RTD civ. 2009. 
    6. CEDH, Chauvy et autres contre France, requête n° 64915/01 (29 juin 2004).
    7. F Cependant, l’héritier « indigne » qui diffame son auteur décédé perd le droit d’agir pour protéger l’honneur du mort et ouvre ainsi la voie à la diffamation par des tiers. Voir Bernard BEIGNIER, L’honneur et le droit, Paris, LGDJ, 1995
    8. Ghani H. Taha ,L'omission illicite comme source de la responsabilité civile délictuelle (étude de droit suisse, français et irakien), Thèse, Université de Genève, Suisse,1966.
    9. Gilissen John. La responsabilité civile et pénale de l'historien (1e partie). In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 38, fasc. 2, 1960.
    10. et L. Mazeaud, A. Tunc, Traité théorique et pratique de la responsabilité civile délictuelle et contractuelle, Préf. H. Capitant, t. 1, 3e éd.,1900-1993.
    11. MAUREL-INDART: LE PLAGIAT LITTÉRAIRE, UNE CONTRADICTION EN SOI ?.p.60, Article disponible en ligne à l’adresse https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-information-litteraire-2008-3-page-55.htm. Dernière visite, ,(Jan, 27, 2024.)
    12. Henri Irénée MARROU, De la connaissance historique, Paris, Seuil, 1954.
    13. Carbonnier, Le silence et la gloire: D. 1951.
    14. Jacques MARZAC, L’affaire Branly, Poitiers, Michel Fontaine, 2005
    15. Jean STENGERS, « L’historien face à ses responsabilités », Cahiers de l’École des sciences philosophiques et religieuses (Facultés universitaires de Saint-Louis), 15, 1994.
    16. Jean-Denis BREDIN, « Le droit, le juge et l’historien », Le Débat, 32, 1984.
    17. Jean-Marie Moeglin , La vérité de l’histoire et le moi du chroniqueur, Éditions de la Sorbonne1999
    18. Jean-Pierre AZÉMA, « L’Histoire au tribunal. Un échange avec Georges Kiejman », Le Débat, 102, 1998.
    19. Luc BROSSOLLET, DROIT AU CAPRICE OU DROIT À L'INFORMATION ? La reprise d'informations précédemment divulguées par l'intéressé au regard de l'article 9 du code civil, 26/3/2023.
    20. Michèle COTTA, La collaboration 1940-1944, Paris, A. Colin, 1963.
    21. Nathalie MALLET-POUJOL, « De la biographie à la fiction: la création littéraire au risque des droits de la personne », Légicom, 24, 2001.
    22. Perinçek v. Switzerland, App. No. 27510/08, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2013).
    23. Philippe CONTE, « La bonne foi en matière de diffamation: notion et rôle », in Mélanges Albert Chavanne, Paris, Litec, 1990.
    24. Nerson, Le respect par l'historien de la vie privée de ses personnages, Mélanges Falletti, Annales Faculté de Droit et Sciences Économiques de Lyon, Dalloz, 1971,
    25. Savatier, Traité de la responsabilité civile, 2e éd., t. 1, n° 46 ; cf. J. Carbonnier, Le silence et la gloire: D. 1951,
    26. Richard POSNER, Droit et littérature, Paris, PUF, 1996,
    27. Saint-Exupéry: « riche documentation », « abondante bibliographie référencée en fin d’ouvrage ». TGI Paris, 21 septembre 1994,
    28. Thomas HOCHMANN, « Le procès du Procès de Jean-Marie Le Pen », Revue de droit pénal et de criminologie, 88 (4), 2008.
    29. Thomas Hochmann, LES LIMITES À LA LIBERTÉ DE L'« HISTORIEN » EN FRANCE ET EN ALLEMAGNE, Éditions juridiques associées, 2008/2 n° 69-70 | page540.
    30. Thomas Hochmann, Faurisson, « falsificateur de la jurisprudence »? Faurisson, “Falsifier of the Case Law”? Technologies, Droit et Justice, 61 | 2011.
    31. Traité pratique de la responsabilité civile, 6e éd. par P. Azard, Paris, Dalloz 1962.
    32. Tribunal civil de la Seine, 28 juin 1928, Dalloz mensuel, 2e partie, 1932.
    33. Yves MAYAUD, Le mensonge en droit pénal. Essai d’une théorie générale, thèse, Lyon III, 1976.

    رابعًا: مراجع باللغة الألمانية:

    1. BUNDESAMT FÜR VERFASSUNGSSCHUTZ, Rechtsextremischer Revisionismus, ein Thema von heute, Cologne, 2001.
    2. Herbert TRÖNDLE et Thomas FISCHER, Beck’ische Kurzkommentar, Strafgesetzbuch, Munich, C.H. Beck, 52e éd., 2004, §130, n°25-35.par, Thomas Hochmann, LES LIMITES À LA LIBERTÉ DE L'« HISTORIEN » EN FRANCE ET EN ALLEMAGNE, Éditions juridiques associées, 2008,
    3. LG München I, Urteil vom 09.08.2022 – 18 Ns 510 Js.371/21Fundstelle: BeckRS 2023
    4. Thomas WANDRES, Die Strafbarkeit des Auschwitz- Leugnens, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2000, p. 230. Mentionné à Paula Rhein-Fischer and Simon Mensing, Memory Laws in Germany: How Remembering National Socialism Is Governed through Law, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher (TOAEP), 2022

     

    1.  

    Research references

    First: references in Arabic:

    1. Ibrahim Abdulaziz Ibrahim Daoud, civil liability for the fault of abstention. Comparative Study, Journal of the spirit of laws at the Faculty of law, Tanta University, 2011.
    2. Ahmed Shaaban Mohammed Taha, civil liability for professional error of each doctor, pharmacist, lawyer and architect, new university House, 2010.
    3. Ayman Saad Salim, abstinence as a source of civil responsibility, Arab Renaissance Cairo, 2003.
    4. Hassan Hussein al-Barawi, the dangers of development between the establishment of the centennial and exemption from it, the House of the Arab renaissance, 2008.
    5. Hassan Hallak, history and the historian's responsibility in correcting and rewriting history international conspiracies and interventions in Lebanon 1840 – 1860 examples, February 2020.
    6. Riyad Ahmed Abdul Ghafoor, "the Legal Center of the historian is a study in the obligations, rights and civil responsibility of the historian", the researcher Journal of Legal Sciences, Volume II, second issue, 2021.
    7. El-Saghir Mohamed Mahdi, the error of omission in civil liability: an analytical and Comparative Study, Journal of the Faculty of law for legal and Economic Research, P.1, Alexandria University - Faculty of Law, 2014.
    8. Tarek Sorour, publishing and media crimes, first edition, Arab renaissance House-Cairo 2004.
    9. Abdul Rahim Al-Hasnawi, historical criticism in the historian's logic: theoretical and methodological visions, al-Kalima forum for studies and research, P.29, No. 116, 2022.
    10. Mohammed jreo, civil liability arising from electromagnetic pollution damage, new university House, 2010.
    11. Mansouriya Kaddour, historical criticism and its importance in highlighting the historical truth, Al-Riwaq Journal for social and humanitarian studies, volume ٧, issue ۱, ۲٠۲۱.

    Second: references in English

    1. PU Chao, legal issues about posthumous reputation and posthumous privacy: censorship of history, law, politics and culture, Syracuse Journal of international law and trade, fall, 2014.
    2. David H. Flaherty, privacy and secrecy: the responsibilities of historians, reviews in American History, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Sept., 1980).
    3. David J. E. Chmiel, five trends in geopolitical risks for investors to watch in 2018 and beyond, according to the law as of February 05, 2018
    4. Dilman (B.), "Music and history bureau", law and society 3 38-1998,
    5. Jackson, Dick, cultural property protection in Stabilization Operations, Army lawyer, Vol. 2008, issue 10 (October 2008).
    6. Jonathan Gorman, history and theory, Dec., 2004, Vol. 43, No. 4, topic of No. 43: historians and ethics (Dec., 2004).
    7. Kevin Chamberlain, war and cultural heritage: an analysis of the 1954 convention for the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict and its protocols 7 (2004)
    8. Luigi cagani, "criminal laws in history: the state of the European Union", historin11 (2011):
    9. Nelson, William E., history and neutrality in the constitutional chapter, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 72, issue 7 (October 1986)
    10. Pierre Nora, "history, memory and law in France, 1990-2010," history11 (2011)
    11. Ravi wartanian, memory laws in France and their implications: institutionalizing social harmony, humanism at work, November 2009.
    12. Richard J. Evans, history, memory and the law: the historian as an expert witness, 41. Theory 326, 2002.
    13. Rob Kahn, free speech, official history, and national politics: toward categorizing objections to memory laws, Florida Journal of international law, fall, 2019
    14. Robert A. Kahn, Holocaust denial and the law: a comparative study 17-22 (2004).
    15. Weaver,Russell L. Debier, Nicolas; poissier, Lawrence, Holocaust denial and the state-proclaimed "truth": French and American perspectives, Tex. TCL rev 495 (2008-2009).

    Third: references in French

    1. 27. Antoine Proust, " Histoire, in auchrité, M. auchthudes. Arguments of structures in history", Lou D. ushbat, 92, 1996.
    2. Bertrand Mathieu," La liberteche de la Recherche, fundamental and international constitutive law", in Marie-Angeli Hermite (dir.), La Libert-search and frontiers, Paris, romillat, 2001, p. 59.
    3. C. Fanatic, information information and protection of private competition, ll, November. 1995,
    4. Carol vivant, history of law, Daluz, Paris, 2007.
    5. Carol vivant, the sissy history of law. Contribution-history Law School-Catherine boigeler - RT DSI. 2009.
    6. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, report of France, request No. 64915/01 (29 June 2004).
    7. And Cependant, L'héritier "indigne" qui differme son auteur décédé bird le droit d'agir pour protéger l honor de Chevalier du mort et ouvre ainsi la voie à la defamation par des levels. Foire Bernard pinier, honor and the law, Paris, LG DJ, 1995
    8. Gani H. Taha L'omission illicéité comme source de la responsabilité civile délictuelle (étude de droit Switzerland, français et irakien), Thèse, Université de Genève,Switzerland, 1966.
    9. Gleason, John. Civil and historical liability (1e parties). In: Journal of philology and history, Tommy 38, Vask. 2, 1960.
    10. H. et L. Mazeaud, A. Tunc, Traité théorique et pratique de la responsabilité civile délictuelle et contractuelle, Préf. H. Capitant, t. 1, 3e éd.,1900-1993.
    11. H. Morel-Indart:if a little plagiarism, a contradiction en SOA?.P. 60, the material is not replaceable https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-information-litteraire-2008-3-page-55.htm. visit Derni Ermir, (January 27, 2024.)
    12. Henri Eyre ocean O'shea Maru, de la connaissance Historique, Paris, Seuil , 1954.
    13. C. Carbonier, le silence et al. la gloire: d. 1951.
    14. Jacques marzac , Laver Branly , Poitiers, Michel Fontaine, 2005
    15. Jan Stingers, "the historical face of responsabilitys", Cahiers diole School of Sciences philosophy and religion (Saint Louis University), 15, 1994.
    16. Jean-Denis Bredin," Law, Law and history", Lew de ushbat, 32, 1984.
    17. Jean-Marie Moglen, la vie d'histoire et d'histoire, auchterelles De La Sorbonne 1999
    18. Jean-Pierre AZ Irma, " the court of the history of the African Union. Change the change with George kijman", Lou D. oshpat, 102, 1998.
    19. Luc brossolet, right to caprice or LEGALINFORMATION information? Or in connection with Article 9 of the Civil Code, 26/3/2023.
    20. Mishel Kota, the Los Angeles collaboration 1940-1944, Paris, a.Cullen , 1963.
    21. Nathalie Mallet-Pujol," biography-fiction: fiction is a little difficult for Human Rights", El ergicum, 24, 2001.
    22. Switzerland, application. No. 27510/08, euros. MMM. H. R. (2013).
    23. Philippe Conte," freedom of expression of difference: the idea and the novel", in IM erlanges Albert Chavannes, Paris, letec, 1990.
    24. R. Nerson, respect for the history of private rivalry between individuals, M. erlanges Valeti, analis facult-law and science-conomics de Lyon, Daluz, 1971,
    25. R. Savatier, civil liability response expert, 2nd HD Dr., R. 1, N 4 46 ; CF. C. Carbonier, le silence et le gloire: d. 1951,
    26. Richard Posner, the law and the young, Paris, boeuf, 1996,
    27. St. exope erkri: "documents of wealth", "bibliography of scientific research". Paris, 21 September 1994,
    28. Thomas Hochmann," the human rights law of Jean-Marie Le Pen", Journal of criminal law, 88 (4), 2008.
    29. Thomas Hochmann, Les limites - La Libert-de l "historie" in France et al.in the world, ochers legal association Ochs, 2008/2 N 6 69-70 | P. 540.
    30. Thomas Hochmann, Faurisson,"fake de la jurisprudence"? Faurisson, the "forger of judicial precedents"? Technologies, law and Justice, 61 | 2011.
    31. Meritocracy pra civil civ responsibility application, 6HD d. Bar B. Azhard, Paris, Toulouse 1962.
    32. Civil court De La Seine, June 28, 1928, Dalles minswell, 2 e Barty, 1932.
    33. Yves Maillaud, Le mensong en Brut Valley. Issei doon th ochuri J ochren ochrali, th Ochs, Lyon III, 1976.

    Fourth: references in German

    1. BUNDESAMT FÜR VERFASSUNGSSCHUTZ, Rechtsextremischer Revisionismus appointed Thema von heute, Cologne, 2001.
    2. Herbert tremendl and Thomas Fischer, beckisch kurzkommenter, strafgeszbuch, Munich, C. H. Beck, 52 eut d., 2004, 1 130, N n 25-35.Pari passu, Thomas Hochmann, Le limet-La Libre-de-l '"historienne" in France et en alemagne, ochers legal association Ochs, 2008,
    3. LGM ushenchin I, ortelfom 09.08.2022-18 NS 510 js.371/21 box: Lakers 2023
    4. Thomas wandres, die strafbarket Des Auschwitz-liugenens, Berlin, Duncker & hamblot, 2000, p. 230. Paula Raine Fischer and Simon Mensing, memory laws in Germany: how remembering National Socialism is governed by law, Turkle Opsal academic electronic publishing, 2022

ملفات

شارك

إرسال الاستشهاد إلى

الإحصائيات